| [ sciEncE ] in KIDS 글 쓴 이(By): limelite (호기심) 날 짜 (Date): 2001년 1월 31일 수요일 오후 01시 06분 39초 제 목(Title): Re: William Paley >존재의 본질이 운동이며, 존재들이 >스스로 구조체를 형성하고 발전시키며 해체한다는 개념을 >이해 못하는 사람이 수두룩하니..... >=============================== >흠냐.. 이해 못하는 사람입니다. >이게 무슨 뜻입니까??? 보충 설명을.. 네... http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/history/paley.html 파섹님이 소개하신 위 웹페이지를 보면, 문제의 Paley의 비유가 다음처럼 소개되어 있습니다. . . . when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive. . . that its several parts are framed and put together for a purpose, e.g. that they are so formed and adjusted as to produce motion, and that motion so regulated as to point out the hour of the day; that if the different parts had been differently shaped from what they are, or placed after any other manner or in any other order than that in which they are placed, either no motion at all would have been carried on in the machine, or none which would have answered the use that is now served by it. . . . the inference we think is inevitable, that the watch must have had a maker -- that there must have existed, at some time and at some place or other, an artificer or artificers who formed it for the purpose which we find it actually to answer, who comprehended its construction and designed its use. 이 비유가 왜 잘못된 것일까요? 왜 당시에는 이런 잘못된 생각을 자연스럽게 하게 되었을까요? 왜 잘못되었는지에 대해서는 위 웹 페이지에도 두가지 관점의 답이 간략히 적혀 있습니다만... *************************************************** * lime 인사 - 새해 복 많이 마니 many 받으세요. ^^ * *************************************************** |