| [ PhilosophyThought ] in KIDS 글 쓴 이(By): mason (순간적으로) 날 짜 (Date): 2001년 6월 19일 화요일 오후 02시 16분 42초 제 목(Title): Re: 여전히 펜로즈가 뭘 '증명'했다고 거론되는지는 모르겠지만 그것이 quantum entanglemant blah blah 라면 반박하는 논문이 있습니다. Max Tegmark, The importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes, Phys.Rev. E61 (2000) 4194-4206 Abstract Based on a calculation of neural decoherence rates, we argue that that the degrees of freedom of the human brain that relate to cognitive processes should be thought of as a classical rather than quantum system,..blah..blah.. This conclusion disagrees with suggestions by Penrose and others that the brain acts as a quantum computer, and that quantum coherence is related to consciousness in a fundamental way. ------------------- "수학은 원래 신기하고 신성한 거야." --- 허영만, '타짜' 중에서. |