| [ USA ] in KIDS 글 쓴 이(By): hongcho (홍이) 날 짜 (Date): 2008년 1월 11일 금요일 오후 04시 41분 18초 제 목(Title): Re: NYTimes Op-ed: Women are never .. ------ The main thesis of her article is that "Hillary is not a front-runner because she is a woman" ------ I don't know if it's my reading comprehension, but I didn't read it like that. I thought she was saying that the pundits/media were looking at the result of the Iowa caucuses and saying that she's not a front-runner because she is a woman. Sure, the article did pushed some gender cards: she did write "and she's a woman" at the end. But I can also argue that a significant portion of your argument was playing a race card. What I am saying is that those cards will get played by those in the politics to suit their needs. I guess I don't have much of an expectation from the people involved in the politics. Maybe that's why I didn't think the article deserved to be labeled "the most disappointing article I've read". To me, it was just an op-ed piece, just one person's opinion (with or without an honest intention). That's why I was curious. Thanks for sharing your passion. 홍 (ab0049/aa0273/EQ0033/EG0142/EE0031/DZ0179/DV0048/DU0183/DT0121/AU25). |