| [ QuizWit ] in KIDS 글 쓴 이(By): mkjung (iSTHMUS) 날 짜 (Date): 2000년 11월 9일 목요일 오후 03시 46분 27초 제 목(Title): babo vs. babo 1) I didn't say Go is harder than human genome! Nobody knows that. OK, are you saying that Go is no harder than human genome because nobody proved Go to be harder than human genome? Do you know what 'no harder than' means? Do you know what 'no larger than' means? Haven't I told you? Sombody proved that a restricted version of Go is no easier than human genome! I wonder at the depth of your stupidity. 2) The game of Go is PSPACE-Complete, while most problems in the human genome project are NP-Complete. People strongly believe that PSPACE-Complete problems are much harder than NP-Complete problems. I think 5x5 go can be solved by current computers but 19x19 go will not be solved in a trillion years with the current technology. Further, the version of Go that is shown to be PSPACE-Complete is a stripped-down version of real Go game. =========================================== these are your two statement. i see some contradiction and change of stance here. :) the reason i first involved in this 'go' vs. genome argument was that i didn't believe go is harder than genome. then suddenly you poped up saying 2) hence reputing my claim and strongly suggesting go is harder than genome. a) "people strongly believe...bla bla..." b) "further, the version of go that is shown to be pspace-complete is a stripped-down version bla bla.... " when you can't prove anything and back up your statement, my 1 cent worth argument is as good as yours. the only thing you did so far is endlessly arguing with me and shouting "ta~ ta~ tauto~ tauto~ tautology~ ". think hard who is real stupid. a) a person who is stupid b) a person who is arguing with a stupid person. :) |