[ Politics ] in KIDS 글 쓴 이(By): clearsea (晴海) 날 짜 (Date): 2009년 09월 10일 (목) 오후 08시 16분 52초 제 목(Title): Re: 사회과학은 과학인가? 저는 galois님이 과학에 대한 이해가 매우 부족한 것이 거의 확실하다고 봅니다. 수식어 문제는 그럴 수도 있겠군요. 그 가능성을 인정합니다. 연금술이나 종교나 저에게는 둘 다 뜬금없는 이야기였네요. 플로지스톤 이론을 과학 이론으로 일컫는 자료는 봤는데 연금술로 부르는 자료는 있을지 궁금증이 생기는군요. 참조: This shift was partly simple self-promotion by chemists in the new environment of the Enlightenment, whose vanguard glorified rationalism, experiment, and progress while demonizing the mystical. However, it was also becoming ever clearer that certain central ideas of alchemy (especially metallic transmutation) had never been demonstrated. One of the leaders in this regard was the German physician and chemist Georg Ernst Stahl, who vigorously attacked alchemy (after dabbling in it himself) and proposed an expansive new chemical theory. Stahl noted parallels between the burning of combustible materials and the calcination of metalsthe conversion of a metal into its calx, or oxide. He suggested that both processes consisted of the loss of a material fluid, contained within all combustibles, called phlogiston. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/108987/chemistry/259704/Phlogiston-theory ======================================= 자유민주주의 성냥불 이야기 http://ahnabc.blogspot.com |