| [ Christian ] in KIDS 글 쓴 이(By): RNB (rainbow) 날 짜 (Date): 2001년 12월 9일 일요일 오후 03시 08분 19초 제 목(Title): Summary I was supposed to write details about your logical faults. but I realize that that's meaningless. (if you want, i will say just base on your request - don't make argument about "if...", you anti-christian guys. ok?) I think that no body wants to follow the details and I realize that English has not a great apeal in my home country. My expectation is based on the number of inquiries (No of reading). No matter what the detail is, the most important thing that I want to focus on is, our conclusions and their implications. Your conclusion is: A same conclusion CANNOT be obtained from both of belief and logical reasoning. My conclusion is: A same conclusion CAN be obtained from both of belief and logical reasoning. And your implication from conclusion is: Logic and belief conflict to each other. My implication from conclusion is: Logic and belief complement to each other. direct comparisons between yours and mine are not availiable because your definitions and mine are quite different from each other. The key difference is, You define "logic and belief" by its way of getting. Belief and non-belief are defined by existance of logical reasoning. (complement set of logic) I define "logic and belief" by its conclusion and content, respectively. And belied and non-belief (known) are defined by existance of evidance not the existance of logical reasoning. Example) I believe "It will snow tomorrow" because TV forecase said so today, and the TV forecast have been correct this week. Conclusion: "It will snow tommorrow" Your oppinionn: This is logical reasoning not the belief because there is logical reasoning. My oppinion: This is logical reasoning as well as belief, because there is logical reasoning and there is not enough evidence to prove tommorrow's snow. ___ I think that's the most simplest summary for what we have been talking about. If we have more to discuss, I want to do that base on the summary. It is more efficient. Don't you think so? |