| [ Christian ] in KIDS 글 쓴 이(By): RNB (rainbow) 날 짜 (Date): 2001년 12월 8일 토요일 오전 08시 09분 24초 제 목(Title): about definition This is your starting point: I was speaking that a single specific conclusion cannot be both a logical conclusion and belief simultaneously. I meant this by 'logic and belief conflicts fundamentally'. _______________ I will say you directly. Belief can be defined according to reality (existance of evidence) not by logic. If we don't have enough evidence, we say, "we believe something". If we have enough evidence, we say, "we know something". (Don't ask me about how much evidence is enough.) Although we are now believing something, we can logically think about that at the same time using logical induction. In your example, I believe "It will snow tomorrow". I induce that "It will snow tomorrow" because of forecast which has been making credible results. A single specific conclusion, "It will snow tomorrow" can comes from my belief and also logical induction. The conclusion of logic(X) and belief (Y) is not complimentary set(X^C). There can be something common. Your derivation is simply wrong from the starting point. |