| [ Christian ] in KIDS 글 쓴 이(By): RNB (rainbow) 날 짜 (Date): 2001년 12월 7일 금요일 오전 10시 49분 40초 제 목(Title): Re: Definitions you said: The problem is you did not present '2.' and you have no ground to 'induce' '3.' from '1.' Without such a link, how can you make any kind of logical process, be it 'syllogism' or 'induction'? and say again: I know that B is assumed when you said 'If A the C'. So I granted 'If A the C' is logical in itself. And B enables induction of C from A. I did not question it. I simply accepted the induction from A to C, assuming B. _____________ Anyway you agree that "B enables induction of C from A." therefore my travels to mars is logical. you said: I say again, I did not question 'how did you induce C from A'. What I questioned is, granting 'I know NASA has such and such ability with sufficient fund and program', how did you induce 'C' from 'If A then C'. ____________ you said you did not question, 1."how did you induce C from A' but 2. "how did you induce 'C' from 'If A then C'" Very difficult to catch the point. Sorry. What does 2. mean and what are the realations to my statements? If possible, I will explain. |