| [ Christian ] in KIDS 글 쓴 이(By): parsec ( 먼 소 류 ) 날 짜 (Date): 2001년 12월 7일 금요일 오전 09시 27분 33초 제 목(Title): Re: Definitions >That was my question to you. your answear is 2. is simple statement which >does not represent the reality. (and also it is not an assumption either.) > >I am sorry, As you said I don't know what you are saying about the >statement is. (not the explanation of reality, neither the assumption, >then, what's the function of your statement up there. Explanation of >imaginary? Then it's the assumption. OK? If statement '2.' represents the reality or not is another problem. The problem is you did not present '2.' and you have no ground to 'induce' '3.' from '1.' Without such a link, how can you make any kind of logical process, be it 'syllogism' or 'induction'? ◇ ~~~_ _ ∴ ~|~| | _/__, SEP. 11. 2001 _ ∴∴ _ ~ | | ＼ ` Armorica under a tat ,-| `,-,_| |__ | | | A ______|_|__|_|___|__|| | |__|_|_____________________________________ |