| [ Christian ] in KIDS 글 쓴 이(By): RNB (rainbow) 날 짜 (Date): 2001년 12월 7일 금요일 오전 04시 15분 38초 제 목(Title): Re: Definitions You said: You say very easily. But you are wrong about the conclusion of "If ...". This can stand: 1. "If NASA makes vacation program on Mars that I can buy the ticket for,I can walk on Mars." 2. NASA is making such a program 3. From 1. and 2., I can walk on Mars But you omitted 2. and 3 cannot be drawn from 1 only. So it's not a logical conclusion from 1. ________________ You already said, logical conclusion can be obtained without comparing with reality. (if you want change this, do that) You said Newtonian continuum mechanics is logical even if it starts from the unproved assumption. and you said statement 1 is a set of logical statement to get the conclusion. then, now you suggest to include 2. and 3. to get logical conclusion. what does 2. mean? you mean I need to prove it will happen for sure? If 2. does not mean the proof, but the assumption, then what's the effect of including 2. in the procedure even though there is already the same unproved assumption in statement 1. you mean the number of statement is important to be a logical conclusion? What's your real point? Proving 2. ? |