| [ Christian ] in KIDS 글 쓴 이(By): RNB (rainbow) 날 짜 (Date): 2001년 12월 6일 목요일 오후 04시 54분 24초 제 목(Title): Re: My travel to Mars But if he said, "Assume particle state is continuum, then it follows that XXX is AAA" it would be a logical statement. But then again if he said "I believe XXX is AAA" then it is illogical because he didn't present the essential element of the syllogism. ___________ So you are talking about the structure of statement. not the contents of it (XXX is AAA) to say it logical or illogical. And you use "conflict" to explane the diffrence of statement structure (or procedure) not the content. You look different from my point of view. as you think of mine. Going back to first place, Mine is: Some belief (the contents of belief) can be illogical or logical (a conclusion from logical sequence). So don't say belief is the contrary of the logic such as (belief is) 본질적으로 논리와는 상극입니다. Example, I believe miracle. Yours: The ways of belief and logical thinking have nothing in common and conflict. (belief is) 본질적으로 논리와는 상극입니다. right? Then basically, we can stand simultaneously. although we have differnt oppion about unified theory, miracle, space travel, Newtonian physics, and Einstein. If you want, add yours. |