| [ Christian ] in KIDS 글 쓴 이(By): RNB (rainbow) 날 짜 (Date): 2001년 12월 6일 목요일 오전 10시 28분 19초 제 목(Title): Re: My travel to Mars Dear parsec, you said: I told you [1-1](starting with "If") was a logical reasoning, because it had its 'if'. But '[1]' did not mention 'if', but only contained 'believe'. You 'jumped' from [1-1] to [1] without proving the 'if's. If you derived [1] from [1-1] by proving the 'if's in [1-1], [1] could be a logical conclusion. But you didn't. That's why [1] was illogical while [1-1] was logical. You are far behind metioning mathematics. ____________ I am so sorry, I cannot catch your point. [1] I believe I can walk on Mars. supporting logical reasoning: [1-1] If NASA ..... You agree with that [1-1] is a logical reasoning. If [1-1] is proved, then my belief [1] could be a logical conclusion. If not, illogical. So, your standard to determine whether belief is logical or illogical is whether supporting logic is proved or not. You said so. ????? Consequently, You may say that Newtonian mechanics is illogical because it uses unproved assumption when it was developed. (Newton didn't prove the particle state is continuum.) Sounds strange to me. what's your point? |